
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Make-up Compacts?

Turning Asphalt Into Edible Education
This article is similar to my first idea for Design Problem 2 of going to preschools and planting vegetable and fruit gardens with the children to gain appreciation of nature and in favor creating less production/pollution by home growing veggies, as well as promoting healthier eating. That's pretty much what Celia Kaplinsky, a Brooklyn elementary school principal, did with New York children.
There are already 285 school gardens in New York City, according to a recent state survey, part of a national school gardening trend. Most are small affairs, completely reliant on parent volunteers and teachers’ spare time...The P.S. 216 project, known as an Edible Schoolyard, is part of a second generation of gardens, which involve things like state-of-the art greenhouses, professional staff, large city grants, and ever-more-ambitious agendas. Ms. Waters’s project, for example, aims to find a solution to childhood obesity by integrating the lessons of food growing, food preparation and healthy eating through the curriculum. A recent study found that her projects in Berkeley had made headway toward that goal."
My opinion? This is great. More projects like this should be stirred up all around -- it's a great experience for children and teaches them at the core age that habits form. Like I said, they gain a better appreciation and understanding of nature and how it works, they get to really help and see the development/growth of natural things, all while eating healthier, natural and organic foods (in turn creating less pollution for foods that need to be shipped and cleaned from other countries, states, etc).
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/turning-asphalt-into-edible-education/
NYTimes: Needing Students, Maine School Hunts in China
"Faced with dropping enrollment and revenue, a high school in [Millinocket, Maine], a remote town, has fixed on an unlikely source of salvation: Chinese teenagers. Never mind that Millinocket is an hour’s drive from the nearest mall or movie theater, or that it gets an average 93 inches of snow a year. Kenneth Smith, the schools superintendent, is so certain that Chinese students will eventually arrive by the dozen — paying $27,000 a year in tuition, room and board — that he is scouting vacant properties to convert to dormitories."
A school that once held over 700 students, now only has 200 students enrolled. It's enrollment decreased after the paper mill went bankrupt in 2003 -- a main source of jobs in the town. So, the superindendent of the school in this town is convinced that he will be able to get Chinese students to come to Maine to attend their school. I personally think this is crazy. I think that he is completely taking advantage of the fact that Chinese students want to come to the states, and feeding off of their nievety, probably thinking that anywhere in the States is amazing, fun, etc. Well, I don't know if anyone would really want to live in a remote area like Millincoket, Maine if they had the choice. I could be wrong, and perhaps this would be a good experience for Chinese students if they did choose to come study in this town for a year. Any way of being submersed in another culture is a great thing, given how sheltered many people around the world really are -- it opens peoples eyes to what is going on in the world around them (socially, economically, environmentally, etc), gives them new ways of thinking, and other great opportunities. But, I think Smith is completely taking advantage of the situation for his school's personal financial and academic gain. I don't know if I would say it's completely wrong or right one way or another, I just don't personally really agree with it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/27/education/27students.html?ref=todayspaper
NYTimes: Riches May Not Help Papua New Guinea
"In 2014, ExxonMobil is scheduled to start shipping natural gas through a 450-mile pipeline and on to Japan, China and other markets in East Asia. But the project, which is expected to bring Papua New Guinea $30 billion over three decades and to radically increase its gross domestic product, will force a country already beset by state corruption and to grapple with the windfall... Local leaders worry about the continuing flow of guns [with more money coming in through ExxonMobil] into an area with almost no government presence, and no paved roads, electricity, running water, banks or post offices...While the West's richest companies are used to seeking natural resources in the world's poorest corners, few places on earth seem as ill-prepared as the Southern Highlands of Papua New Guinea."
Okay, first off, I think it's outrageous that we are going into the poorest countries of the world and robbing them of their resources in order to fulfill our greedy, snobby desires, in order to better OUR lives. And we wonder why so many other countries don't like us? I don't understand how we continuously take and take and take from other unbelievably poor countries to make our lives richer, easier, and "better." Did it ever occur to ExxonMobil that maybe it isn't that we need to go take oil from the poorest countries because it's becoming scarce everywhere else, but maybe that we need to find other means of energy? Probably not, because just like every other American business, their probably greedy and just want to fill their pockets the quickest, easiest way possible. What about sustainable development -- meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs? Or, like discussed in Designers, Visionaries, and Other Stories, Triple Top Line -- the objective to balance economic, social, and environmental responsibilities to aim towards a win-win situation and focus on 'effectiveness' rather than 'efficiency.' Sheesh, come on people.
Like Albert Einstein said, "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/10/25/world/1026PAPUA-2.html
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Change of Pace!


Here's a cool website I found sort of revolving around this same idea: http://weburbanist.com/creative-recycled-art-architecture-and-design/
"Many people associate environmentalism with gloom-and-doom predictions about the planet. While climate change is a serious issue, many artists, architects and other designers are also working on smaller scale green projects that both effect the environment and cause change by sparking discussion and reflection. While the actual direct impact of any given artwork or design may be small the cumulative result of their efforts is palpable and grows bigger with each creative and sustainable design or art project."
"Recycled Material Used in Furniture Design and Construction: While some of these works could be considered kitsch a number of these are not only functional but also aesthetically compelling. Many recycled furniture designs flaunt their former lives as anything from bicycle tires to bath tubs. Instead of simply going for an ultra-sleek piece of modern hipster furniture, why not try something a bit out of the ordinary that is also good for the environment?"

Other cool recycled products that I found on http://ecoble.com/2008/03/12/10-unusually-creative-ways-to-recycle-ordinary-objects/

Monday, October 11, 2010
Spice4Life: Teaching Children the Importance of Recycling
Teaching Children the Importance of Recycling
Actor Robert Redford was once quoted as saying: "I think the environment should be put in the category of our national security. Defense of our resources is just as important as defense abroad. Otherwise what is there to defend?" But why be on the defensive when you can be proactive? And if research is to be believed, the majority of eating and lifestyle habits are formed in children by the age of 10. So, pay attention all parents - the responsibility for teaching your children the importance of recycling and caring for the environment lies with you. Adopting environmentally friendly habits and passing on these life lessons will ensure a sustainable environment for their future and the future is now!
In an ideal society, recycling should be as natural to your children as brushing their teeth, packing away their toys and putting on their seatbelts when climbing into a car. Not because they are radical environmentalists or the offspring of crazy “tree huggers”, but rather simply because it’s all they know! From a tender age, we teach our children to say please and thank you, we tell them not to talk to strangers, not to litter and so many other small yet essential life skills that we don’t even consciously think about. Why should lessons in environmental protection and recycling be any different?
|
http://noconsensus.org/comic-relief.php
Man, I really need to figure out how to post videos on here!
I keep looking for ways other people have already approached children about environmentalism, but all I can find are articles about children and the best learning "environment" ... I need to reword how I'm searching I think... the search continues.
Aha! I'm getting warmer!
From an article at:
http://www.wisegeek.com/how-do-i-teach-a-child-the-importance-of-nature.htm
"Children aren't born understanding the importance of nature, but learn by modeling the behavior of those who are important to them. If they learn from observation that nature is disposable, that is how they will treat it. Children can learn the importance of nature by teaching them a few simple things." >>> The point/idea I'm getting at for Design Problem #2.
"Recycling is a great way to teach your children the importance of nature. It also makes them feel like they are contributing to environmental conservation. This makes it more likely they will continue the behavior later in life. Allow your children to collect all the cans and bottles in the house and trade them in for cash. It is a great motivating factor for children." >>> Good - yes. Boring- yes. I want something that will really stick. Something that's fun to them, that they will remember, and want to repeat.
Marijuana, Once Divisive, Brings Some Families Closer

This article discusses the use of marijuana by elderly people to help with their health issues, such as nausea, dizziness, pain relief from nerve damage, raising heart rate, lowering blood pressure, etc. In some cases, the use of marijuana has helped elderly people to ease off of their medical drugs. Although it may put some people at risk of falls, impaired cognition, impaired memory, and loss of motor control, it seems to have more positives than negatives. It is legal is some states now but not all. In some cases, children of the elderly people have been the suppliers of their marijuana and has brought some families closer by bonding while "making brownies," smoking together occasionally, etc. Although this sort of sounds ridiculous, if its works, it works! I think it's definitely interesting how something illegal and once so secret and so "bad" that we mostly heard younger people were doing, is now coming up as being beneficial for elderly people to use. Times are changing, that's for sure. I think that this if it truly is beneficial for elderly people to use and doesn't have as many side effects as medically prescribed pills, etc, then more doctors, practices, and states should be more open to medical marijuana (after much research and experimenting with the drug, of course). Like I said, times are changing, so we need to change with them at least a little. Closed minds won't benefit anybody, or the future.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/us/10pot.html?src=me&ref=general
In Topeka, the Price of Free Speech

This article talks about the Phelps' family, who practically make up the members of the Westboro Baptist Church. They picket the funerals of dead soldiers with signs that say things such as "Thank God for Dead Soldiers" and have made many controversial stands. (As shown in the picture above with Fred Phelps). They have been at the "heart of decades of local debate about the proper limits of the First Amendment when speech is meant to be as purposefully inflammatory as it is here."
The Phelps' and the Westboro Baptist Church believe "the acceptance of homosexuality has doomed America."
"Fred W. Phelps, whose operation is at the center of the case before the highest court now, arrived [in Topeka] a half-century ago to work as a preacher for a local Baptist church. Now a self-described prophet of God’s wrath, Mr. Phelps has solicited outrage with his venomous protesting at military funerals all over the country — including the burial of a young Marine in Maryland that prompted the case before the Supreme Court — as well as burning the Koran and enlisting his grandchildren to stomp on the American flag."
This situation definitely makes you wonder exactly how far our freedom of speech should be able to go. Yes, it is a right as an American, however, doesn't this seem to be taking the right a little too far? When you're inflicting pain on other people (although it is not physical), isn't there some point where the line needs to be drawn? I think so. Surrounding a funeral of a loved one with hate signs, is disrespectful, insensitive, disgusting, and just rude. I honestly can't believe how some people are these days. Where is the respect?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/us/10kansas.html?pagewanted=2
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
NY Times: Lead Poisoning Kills Nigerian Children
Monday, October 4, 2010
Environmentalism
My four and half year old sister Hailey was definitely my main inspiration and motivation for chosing to do my project geared toward little munchkins. Friday I came home to visit her and she wanted to take our dog, Rico, for a walk around our property (my dad owns 30 acres) on a leash (he NEVER walks on a leash -- little kids are too funny). Anyway, she packed a little book bag of snacks for a picnic. As we were sitting on the grass eating, she went to throw the wrapper to her gummy snacks in the field. I explained to her how you're not supposed to do that and taught her about pollution, how it effects the environment, animals, our health, etc. She picked up her trash and definitely showed concern for the animals affected by pollution. The next day, my other sister, Paige, took her on a walk down the road where they could hear the electricity running through the electric lines above her. Paige asked if she knew what electricity was and Hailey said it's what "gives power to our house." Then Hailey saw trash laying on the side of the road and told Paige that that was bad and would hurt the animals and said, "Hey! I have an idea! We could get a bag and pick up the trash!" No joke. I was so proud of her. This just goes to show that things like this really do get engraved in little kids minds. Tell a 20 or 30 year old and they'll probably forget it by the next day, or think about it, feel bad about it, but do it anyway, or not do anything about it. I think it's the little kids we need to focus on now for a better future later!
From an article on suite101.com on Environmentalism:
Environmentalism is a movement to preserve the health of Earth and its ecosystems. While it is based in science, it's also inspired by values and spirituality.
-eliminating pollution
-protecting biodiversity
-restoring habitat
-slowing climate change
-conserving natural resources
-recycling waste
-reducing consumption
-increasing energy efficiency
-using alternative energy
-monitoring ecosystems
-designing, building and living green
-getting children outdoors >>> see, other people agree!